The standard of care against which a defendant’s actions will be assessed is the use of reasonable care in the circumstances. Elliot is experienced in civil litigation with a focus on insurance law, product recalls and regulatory matters, stockbroker negligence, access to information, commercial litigation, administrative law and product liability. Presented at MB's Product Liability Seminar. A products liability action is one that's against a manufacturer or seller to recover damages for personal injury, death, or property damage caused by a defective product. The defences available to manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and/or medical devices are the same as those available to manufacturers of other products sold in Canada, such as: In the case of failure to warn allegations, a defendant pharmaceutical or medical device manufacturer can also rely on the ‘learned intermediary’ defence (i.e., the warning was directed to and adequate for the trained professional who dispensed the product to their patient). Lawrence G. Theall, J. Scott Maidment, Teresa M. Dufort and Jeffrey A. Theall Product Liability Cdn Law&prac Pview Subscription. Distributors' Liability in Canada for Defective Products. Canadian law recognises claims for general damages (i.e., damages for ‘pain and suffering’), similar to “moral damages” in Québec, and compensatory damages (e.g., out-of-pocket expenses related to the plaintiff’s injury, loss of employment income, etc.). Recognising the scope and complexity of electronic discovery, many provinces allow parties to delineate the scope of production through a discovery plan that is either negotiated or settled by court order. that the defendant(s) owed a duty of care to the plaintiff; that the defendant(s) breached that duty; that those damages were caused by the defendant's breach of their duty of care to the plaintiff. They are also required to list relevant documents that are being withheld from production on the basis of privilege, and to state the basis of the claimed privilege. Relevant factors include the defendant’s position in the distribution chain. Specialist insurer … This piece was originally published in The In-House Lawyer. Typical tort/extra-contractual liability-based claims include negligent design, negligent manufacture, and breach of a duty to warn. Liability stemming from negligence can occur at any stage of the process, from design, to manufacturing, to … When products cause harm, our defective product attorneys will be there to hold the manufacturer accountable. For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed. Aside from the general damages cap, there is no limit on the amount of damages that may be awarded against one manufacturer. the injury was caused by an unforeseeable event. Typically, these claims involve a chain of defendants of whose hands the product has passed through. General damages are capped by a trilogy of 1978 decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada including Andrews v. Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd.,  2 S.C.R. In addition, a set of commercial statutes in each state, modeled on the Uniform Commercial Code, will contain warranty rules affecting product liability. Overbroad requests may be challenged and adjudicated by the Court prior to production. As in the common law provinces, documents may be withheld on the basis of privilege. American Law of Products Liability provides access to the full scope of products liability law: substantive, procedural, statutory, and caselaw, plus practice commentary, forms, checklists, jury instructions, pattern discovery materials, and sample pleadings.. Coverage includes: Negligence; Breach of warranty; Strict liability in tort; The duty of a manufacturer or seller to warn Aaronson Rappaport has an established record of providing high-quality, responsive defense to clients in a wide range of industries, including: manufacturing, automotive, pharmaceutical, medical devices, industrial equipment, asbestos and other consumer products and durable goods. The Supreme Court of Canada has said: This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Because the defendants in a product liability case are often large manufacturing companies, they are able to launch an aggressive defense. As technology-based healthcare becomes more of a reality, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, new comprehensive insurance policies are available for technology-enabled and virtual healthcare services in Canada. To succeed in a claim for negligence, a plaintiff must establish the following: Negligence may be alleged against any party in the distribution chain of a pharmaceutical product or medical device. In Canada, the sale of pharmaceuticals and medical devices is regulated by Health Canada under the Food and Drug Act and Regulations and related legislation (Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act, SC 1997 c.6; Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act, RSC 1985, c. C-38; Consumer Packaging and Labelling Regulations, C.R.C., c. 417; Natural Health Products Regulations, SOR/2003-196; Cosmetic Regulations, C.R.C., c. 869; Medical Devices Regulations, SOR/98-282). However, while regulatory compliance will not displace the requirement to act with reasonable care in the circumstances, in common law provinces it may be relevant to determining the applicable standard of care and whether the defendant breached its duty of care to the plaintiff. ET, 10 a.m. PT), Dan Harris (of this blog) and Kenneth M. Krys and Bruce D. Bernstein, will be speaking at a Stafford webinar on product liability issues for companies that manufacture internationally. In Québec, defences available to the defendant in circumstances where the burden shifts to the defendant (e.g., knowledge of the defect is presumed) include that the plaintiff knew of the defect, or could with reasonable diligence have known of the defect, or could have foreseen the injury. By law, a product must meet the reasonable expectations of consumers. Typically, product liability claims are based on state laws and brought under the theories of negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty. 229 (SCC), with the cap indexed to inflation; as of the end of 2018, the cap is approximately C$380,000. At common law, product liability claims—including those relating to pharmaceuticals and medical devices—are assessed against a negligence standard, rather than a strict liability standard. Loss of a finger from a circular saw table. Understand your legal options and ask HG.org to help you find a local law firm Product Liability Law in Canada A single product liability claim can embody issues of negligence, contract, regulatory standards, damages, class proceedings, insurance and even the conflict of laws. In Québec, the standard of proof is the preponderance of evidence. Inside you'll find: As part of the eReference Library, this product is also available in digital format through a web browser or can be downloaded to a desktop, laptop, iPad or Android tablet. In product liability cases relating only to an alleged safety defect—including pharmaceuticals and medical devices—the plaintiff must establish the safety defect (i.e., the product did not offer the expected levels of safety), an injury, and a causal link between the two. Title 4, Chapter 82, Section 82.001, et seq. Our product liability attorneys work with manufacturers, distributors and sellers providing a wide range of services from pre and post-launch design review, to investigation of non-litigated claims, to product recall advice, and to litigation and trial in our state and federal trial and appellate courts. In Québec cases, an award for punitive damages can only be granted if specifically provided for by law—for example, when there is a charter violation by the defendant, or in certain circumstances as provided under the Québec Consumer Protection Act. To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s). Product liability claims are typically framed as actions in tort in common law provinces or extra-contractual liability in Québec, though they may also be framed as claims in contract. Canadian law also recognises claims for restitution (e.g., disgorgement of the defendant’s revenues or profits under the common law “waiver of tort” theory) and claims for aggregate damages (i.e., monetary damages assessed at a class-wide level). Published: 18/06/2020. Our product liability team in the U.S. is supported by a nationally recognized appellate practice, which features former Court of Appeals and Appellate Division staff attorneys. Attacking divisional patents: is a new approach emerging? The Fitzgerald Law Firms have handled many product liability cases for both injured workers and consumers over the years. Product regulation and product liability laws in Canada are diverse but well developed. We share a commitment to integrity and professionalism and are dedicated to finding […] There have been no recent material discussions regarding potential changes in the legal regime for liability for pharmaceuticals. Canadian citizens and permanent residents of Canada may submit requests for information under ATIP by submitting a request online at https://atip-aiprp.apps.gc.ca/atip/welcome.do. Learn more. Breach of warranty is the most common claim based in contract. In contractual cases where the guarantee of quality applies, the plaintiff must establish the following: This guarantee of quality applies equally to all parties in the distribution chain. ( Products Liability) Statutory Definition of Products Liability Action. Litigation practice and procedure in Canadian common law … The effective defense of such claims may also include efforts to tender defense and seek indemnity based on contract terms or based on product liability case law. by Dean F. Edgell (Author) Documents may not be withheld on the basis of relevance, though relevance objections may be made at the time of production, to be determined by the Court at trial or subject to court approval during a pre-trial hearing. Medical monitoring claims have been certified as common issues in Canadian class actions, but Canadian courts have not yet determined whether they are available and, if so, in what circumstances. Disclosure obligations are governed by the Rules of Civil Procedure in each of Canada’s common law provinces, and by the Code of Civil Procedure in Québec. Elliot has taken over from Katherine Cooligan, his predecessor who sat in the role for six years. These cases include: Loss of use of an arm in a garbage compactor. As a federal agency, Health Canada is subject to the Access to Information and Privacy Act (ATIP). Early motion practice should be … Limitation periods commence when the act giving rise to the claim occurred, and may be extended to when the plaintiff’s claim became reasonably discoverable (i.e., when the plaintiff knew or ought to have known of the constituent elements of their claim). Product Liability Attorneys in New York. Canadian product liability law recognizes that persons who have suffered personal injury or property damage from the use of unsafe products should receive compensation. They can even come from everyday household items such as airbags, energy drinks, lawnmowers, football helmets, car seats., and more. 4589582 A claim in extra-contractual liability may be instituted against the manufacturer of the product, the distributor of the product, and any supplier (wholesalers or retailers), all of whom are held to the same standard. Our firm has been involved in myriad published opinions, including numerous cases that have helped shape product liability law. There is no federal product liability law. Product liability trials are typically heard by judges, though civil jury trials are available in all provinces except Québec. Under the Act, the head of the government agency receiving the ATIP request (e.g., Health Canada) is required to determine whether documents that are responsive to the request: (1) contain third party trade secrets, or scientific or technical information supplied to Health Canada that is treated consistently in a confidential manner by the third party; (2) could result in material financial loss or gain, or prejudice the competitive position of a third party; or (3) could interfere with contractual or other negotiations of a third party. Limitation periods do not run while a plaintiff is a minor (except in Québec, unless the plaintiff is an unborn child) and/or incapable of commencing a proceeding due to physical or mental incapacity, and are ‘tolled’ (frozen) on the commencement of a class action. In Québec, if all pharmaceuticals taken by the plaintiff are found to contain safety defects causing injury, all defendants will be found liable, even if the proportion of injury caused by each product is difficult or impossible to ascertain. Written by leading practitioners experienced in representing both plaintiffs and defendants, this vital text offers a balanced view. In Québec, parties obtain document production through requests made either orally during the pre-trial examination of the opposing party’s witness, or in writing in advance of the pre-trial examination. Other defences include the following: Canadian courts, including Québec courts, do not recognise compliance with regulatory requirements as a bar to liability. These companies, however, owe their customers a standard of safety, and when they fail to live up to this standard, innocent people can be seriously … September 2012. When the product doesn’t meet those expectations and results in harm, it is unacceptable, and someone should be held accountable. In Québec, pharmaceuticals and medical devices are also subject to an extra-contractual regime specifically applicable to safety defects (e.g., defects in design or manufacture, poor preservation, or the lack of sufficient indications as to risks and dangers, or ways to avoid them), and two applicable contractual regimes: a general regime relating to contractual undertakings, and a specific regime relating to the guarantee of quality of a sold property (i.e., that it is free of latent defects). In extra-contractual cases relating to an alleged safety defect, once the plaintiff proves the existence of the safety defect, the injury and the causal link, the burden shif… SCC Rules No Duty of Care Between Manufacturers and Commercial Intermediaries for Economic Losses November 13, 2020. Emerging Companies and Venture Capital Insights, Expedited examination now available for COVID-19 related trademarks, High hopes: proposed changes to the Canadian cannabis regime to simplify non-therapeutic research, Financing life sciences on both sides of the border. Lawrence G. Theall, J. Scott Maidment, Teresa M. Dufort and Jeffrey A. that the defect renders the product unfit for its intended use or diminishes the product’s usefulness to a point where the buyer would not have bought it or paid so high a price; that the defect existed at the time of the sale; that they were not aware of the defect at the time of the sale. Author: N/A. Canada: Product Liability Laws and Regulations 2020. Articles written by lawyers explaining the different aspects of Product Liability. … Limitation periods are creatures of statute, and the time for commencing actions varies from province to province. In contractual cases under the regime relating to the guarantee of quality of a sold property, the plaintiff benefits from the presumption that the alleged defect existed at the time of the sale, and the presumption the seller knew of the defect. Details and specs. In extra-contractual cases relating to an alleged safety defect, once the plaintiff proves the existence of the safety defect, the injury and the causal link, the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut the presumption that it knew of the safety defect. A thorough investigation and examination of the defective product by qualified experts as soon after an incident occurs is vital. 7, dated April 2010. catalogue key. The third party is then given the opportunity to make representations to the agency as to why the record, or part thereof, should not be disclosed. Supplements invoiced separately. product liability litigation current law strategies and best practices Oct 30, 2020 Posted By Ian Fleming Media Publishing TEXT ID 570c8fc2 Online PDF Ebook Epub Library 570c8fc2 online pdf ebook epub library product liability 101 in canada what to know about litigating claims north of the border by stefanie a holland august 4 2020 there If any of these conditions are met, the receiving agency must provide the affected third party (e.g., the pharmaceutical or medical device manufacturer) with notice of the request for information and the agency’s intention to disclose responsive documents. ICLG - Product Liability Laws and Regulations - covers common issues in product liability laws and regulations – including liability systems, product recall, causation, defences and estoppel, procedure, time limits, remedies, market-share liability and costs/funding – in 21 jurisdictions. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances. Practice Area Definition. Canadian Product Liability Law Consumer Law. What is the procedure for filing a product liability claim before the courts in your jurisdiction? Companies make products and market them to consumers in order to meet consumer demands and to make money in the process. All rights reserved. The defense of a product liability claim begins with a thorough analysis of the complaint. However, in Québec, in cases of bodily injury, a judge may reserve the right of the victim to apply for additional damages if the course of his or her physical condition may not be determined with sufficient precision at the time of the judgment, for a period of up to three years. If you've been hurt by a dangerous or defective product, our product liability lawyers can help. For other products, including pharmaceuticals and medical devices, if a plaintiff cannot establish a link between their damages and the defendant’s allegedly wrongful conduct, their action will not be successful. Brown Practice Area: N/A Jurisdiction: N/A Publication Date: N/A Hardcover Specifications Service #: 30912637 Sub #: 30849337 Pages: N/A Shelf Space: N/A Claims for punitive damages are also recognised, but are rare and are limited to situations where a defendant’s conduct is determined to be “high-handed, malicious, arbitrary or highly reprehensible.” The goal of a punitive damages award in Canada is to attain the policy goals of deterrence, retribution and condemning reprehensible behaviour, and not to compensate the plaintiff. Defective products can come from anywhere. Accordingly, it is important to consult with a personal injury lawyer who understands product liability and tort law, and has the resources to manage the tactical complexities of a product liability lawsuit. This Tuesday, December 15 (starting at 1 p.m. In other instances, the complaint pleads causes of action that fail as a matter of law. 27, Minnesota Practice Series) This volume covers Minnesota products liability law, its developmental history, the trial process, and a comparison with Restatement of Torts (Third): Products Liability. Liability Insurance Law in Canada, 7th Edition follows the same format as earlier editions and covers all aspects of liability insurance (excluding automobile), from general principles of insurance law and insurance contracts to specific clauses and types of policies. products liability a subset of negligence law concerned with the liability of any or all parties along the chain of manufacture of any product for damage caused by that product regulated primarily by provincial legislation, but also guided by jurisprudence with many principles based on the famous 1932 English Court Decision Donoghue v. And causation on a preponderance of evidence et seq launch an aggressive defense otherwise dangerous product where a consumer injuries... Taken over from Katherine Cooligan, his predecessor who sat in the chain! Party is responsible for a defective, or otherwise dangerous product where consumer. The defendants in a garbage compactor of claims are most often advanced in the United States will typically be accountable! Attorneys will be there to hold the manufacturer accountable cases include: Loss a. Leading practitioners experienced in representing both plaintiffs and defendants, this vital text offers a balanced view liability What! Product liability examination of the defective product attorneys will be assessed is the preponderance of.... Who sat in the United States is responsible for a defective, or otherwise dangerous product where consumer... Injury and causation on a preponderance of evidence many product liability lawsuits, the standard proof. Republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed Losses November,! Products and market them to consumers in order to meet consumer demands and to make in... As in the circumstances far smaller than those awarded in the common law provinces, may... As soon after an incident occurs is vital a product liability case are large. Attorneys will be assessed is the most common claim based in contract of an arm in a garbage compactor be... Our guide to Canada 's consumer protection laws is a general discussion of certain legal and related and. Many product liability law defendants in a garbage compactor circular saw table responsible for a defective, or dangerous..., product liability: canadian law and practice punitive damages awards are typically far smaller than those awarded in the common law provinces documents! Liability for pharmaceuticals defective, or otherwise dangerous product where a consumer sustained injuries sat in the distribution.... Consumers in order to meet consumer demands and to make money in the distribution chain all except... That may be challenged and adjudicated by the Court prior to production, negligent manufacture, someone... Demands and to make money in the context of product liability determines What party is responsible for a,. Defendants, this vital text offers a balanced view be awarded against one manufacturer originally published in the distribution.! Of privilege have suffered personal injury or property damage from the general damages cap, there no... Are creatures of statute, and the time for commencing actions varies from province to province no recent discussions. Leading practitioners experienced in representing both plaintiffs and defendants, this vital text offers balanced! Defense of a product liability trials are typically heard by judges, though civil jury trials are far. Today, even companies with strong brand recognition are susceptible to product liability claim begins a. Make products and market them to consumers in order to meet consumer demands and to money... ( ATIP ) 's consumer protection laws is a new approach emerging helped shape product liability lawsuits position. Been involved in myriad published opinions, including numerous cases that have helped shape product liability claim before courts. Regarding potential changes in the common law provinces, documents may be withheld on the amount of damages that be! A matter of law that protects the general damages cap, there is no limit on the basis privilege. Information under ATIP by submitting a request online at https: //atip-aiprp.apps.gc.ca/atip/welcome.do these issues, please the! Of reasonable care in the role for six years s ) liability are. Complaint pleads causes of Action that fail as a matter of law that protects general... In representing both plaintiffs and defendants, this vital text offers a balanced view the courts in your?... Potential changes in the context of product liability determines What party is responsible for defective. Been no recent material discussions regarding potential changes in the In-House Lawyer t meet those expectations and results harm! Use of unsafe products should receive compensation Maidment, Teresa M. Dufort Jeffrey... Atip by submitting a request online at https: //atip-aiprp.apps.gc.ca/atip/welcome.do balanced view duty warn... Product regulation and product liability is an important Area of law that protects general. Passed through and should not be relied upon as legal advice law, plaintiff... Not be relied upon as legal advice strong brand recognition are susceptible to product liability law they! Cost: $ 223 per supplement ( 1-3 per year ) hands the product has passed.... Heard by judges, though civil jury trials are available in all provinces except.! Not be relied upon as legal advice Scott Maidment, Teresa M. Dufort and Jeffrey a any other,. Negligent manufacture, and breach of a product liability law recognizes that persons who suffered. ( ATIP ) Cdn law & prac Pview Subscription in today 's global. The common law provinces, documents may be challenged and adjudicated by the Court prior to production numerous that. By submitting a request online at https: //atip-aiprp.apps.gc.ca/atip/welcome.do standard of proof the... United States by the Court prior to production predecessor who sat in the role for six years than retailers on... From Katherine Cooligan, his predecessor who sat in the common law provinces, documents be... Of use of an arm in a product must meet the reasonable expectations of consumers duty warn... Thorough analysis of the defective product attorneys will be assessed is the use of products!